Big changes at Meta
Meta is making significant progress in changing the way it handles false information on its platforms. Starting March 18, the tech giant will begin testing "Community Notes" in the United States, a feature that relies on crowd-sourced input rather than third-party fact-checkers.
This shift represents one of Meta’s biggest content moderation changes in recent years. Previously, the company worked with external organizations to verify the accuracy of posts. Now, the responsibility will shift to everyday users who can add context to potentially misleading content.
The new system will function similarly to the Community Notes feature on X (formerly Twitter). Users will be able to contribute notes to posts on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, offering explanations or additional details. However, for a note to be published, contributors with differing perspectives must agree that it adds meaningful context. This strategy seeks to reduce prejudice and encourage an impartial fact-checking procedure.
In the United States, Meta has already registered almost 200,000 potential contributors. Users must meet specific account security requirements and be at least 18 years old in order to join. Six languages—English, Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, French, and Portuguese—will be supported at first by the functionality.
With this upgrade, Meta is progressively abandoning its long-standing collaboration with independent fact-checking groups. Content in the United States will no longer have external fact-check labels once Community Notes is completely integrated. The business thinks that this new strategy will promote a more open, community-based method of combating false information.
Before the rollout is progressively carried out, contributors will first undergo a training session to enhance their note-writing and note-rating abilities. Over time, Meta plans to expand the application and maybe add more languages.
Meta's new strategy might mark a radical shift in the direction of content filtering, since misinformation is still a major problem in the digital realm. However, the degree to which users trust the system and each other to preserve accurate and reliable information will largely determine how effective it is.